Ian Bremmer and Jane Harman join Bill to discuss whether the fight over reproductive rights may irreparably divide the nation.
Find Real Time with Bill Maher on HBO GO® http://itsh.bo/iioY87.
It’s HBO.
Ian Bremmer and Jane Harman join Bill to discuss whether the fight over reproductive rights may irreparably divide the nation.
Find Real Time with Bill Maher on HBO GO® http://itsh.bo/iioY87.
It’s HBO.
Clear Legislation can negate the need for convoluted interpretations of the constitution by the Supreme Court one way or the other.
Replymurderers lie like they kill, without remorse.
ReplyChild support & alimony needs to start at conception. If men can’t keep their sperm at home, they need to pay rent for it.
ReplyGerrymandering aborted democracy.
ReplyI agree with choice, but my mind changes at a certain point.
ReplyI think the whole abortion issue highlights just how overrated “States Rights” are.
ReplyI love Bill I watch all the time I am a conservative and pro life but the issue is complicated no black and white rule can or should fix this one way or the other. I would love it if you had someone who is pro life on and talk it out for a while i believe this issue deserves at least a long civil conversation between people on both sides
ReplyCrowd is distracting in these clips, some aren’t so much hahaha! Weird.
ReplyPerhaps I’m just in shock hearing about abortion after it was legalized in 1973, I was a senior in high school.
The same shit again. Facsim, here we go.
I believe that Mrs Harman is wrong. The leaked draft will stand. There won’t be a more moderate position from this supreme Court. Will be rolled back in June make no mistake about that. No amount of fighting is going to change them. Just short of the Apocalypse, this will become the new law of land.
ReplyNow, before I have people commenting on this, I am pro-life. I believe that every child should have the opportunity to live. However, I’m also realist. I don’t think a woman who has been raped, or impregnated by incest, or whose life is in danger, should be forced to carry a pregnancy to term. I also feel that the federal government should have no say what a person can or cannot do with their own body. I believe a woman’s right to bear a child or start a family is hers and hers alone. Just because I don’t agree with it, doesn’t mean I’m right.
Mass exodus from these idiotic barbaric states, that’s what will happen.
ReplyA free person? So you’re free to kill your baby. Yeah, that’s real freedom, Bill. /s
ReplyThis is how I feel about Gun rights. And that one is explicitly laid out as “shall not be infringed.” Welcome to my world Bill.
ReplyRoe v Wade was a horrible piece of “law”. It was joke and all lawyers know it. At this point in history it just goes along with overturning every traditional value in this nation just like the original batch of Marxists intended.
ReplyRace to the bottom for trying to save a baby’s life???? It’s as if the world has lost it’s mind. Oh the pure darkness of it all.
ReplyJane Harman for President!
ReplyOn the other hand, the transport of an infant to California may be prohibited since CA is considering permitting post-birth “abortions” for a number of weeks and so he baby could be legally killed while in CA. It’s extreme on both sides.
ReplyWithout prejudice to any of the many definitions of conception; The ‘law’ ostensibly sides with the unborn child. In principle, if ‘women’ could choose which pregnancy to either keep or not.. ‘men’ could then be able to choose either to be responsible or not.. so it should have been either Child support payments or Roe vs. Wade.. don’t honestly see how both could have co-existed in law; it’s probably been 50years of inconsistencies and contradictions..
ReplyWatch the video called Dr. Levatino Destroys Abortion in 2 minutes. You’ll never see abortion the same way again.
ReplyEvery atrocity begins with dehumanizing the victim, The abortion of infants is no different.
Replywhy is it so important a women can kill a baby? because she has her whole life ahead of her?
Reply