Justice Breyer Reveals Why He Didn’t “Respectfully” Dissent The SCOTUS Ruling On Texas

22339
Published on September 15, 2021

Stephen welcomes Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer to the show and gets right down to business, asking about the court’s ruling on the Texas anti-abortion law. Justice Breyer’s new book, “The Authority of the Court and the Peril of Politics,” is available everywhere now. #Colbert #SupremeCourt #JusticeStephenBreyer

Category Tag

15 comments

  • wily wascal 3 years ago

    It’s the judicial activism of chauvinistic Reich-wing Talibanazi SCROTUM justices in action, turning the clock back in America to the Dark Ages, while delegitimizing themselves and the Court.

    Reply
  • Jj Bashir 3 years ago

    Grandpa is the time to retire

    Reply
  • pakpala1 3 years ago

    He needs to retire now…. It time to set a retirement age for these superiority assholes..

    Reply
  • Allan Binu 3 years ago

    Should presidents appoint judges or a judicial committee appoint judges, making judiciary completely independent ?

    Reply
  • Anna Sandul 3 years ago

    Double like!

    Reply
  • alexmap92 3 years ago

    It is outrageous that such a legislative “coup” is even possible…. This may harm and destroy peoples lives for as long as it takes for it to be withdrawn…

    Reply
  • Castle Castle 3 years ago

    So he came to plug his book…

    Reply
  • Dirty Bloomers 3 years ago

    Served 7 years to long.

    Reply
  • fahadkelantan 3 years ago

    If RBG retired as she was asked during Obama’s years, Amy Coney Barrett wouldn’t be in office. This old dude needs to retire.

    Reply
  • Dave Prinsloo 3 years ago

    America should’ve been aborted centuries ago

    Reply
  • yellowwducky 3 years ago

    Retire, TODAY. Heaven forbid some dem senator dies in a state where a rep governor can appoint a republican replacement and then boom, moscow mitch will find a way to not let Biden get a seat replacement during the rest of his term. Learn from the folly and hubris of RGB, get replaced with a like minded (and young!) replacement while its possible.

    Reply
  • YamiOni 3 years ago

    Any “law” that is worded in such a way to avoid judicial review should be regarded as what it is… Not a law. We have checks and balances and a hierarchy for a reason. No single part of government gets to have both the first _and_ last word on a topic. SCOTUS should have either reviewed it, or struck it down for being “un-reviewable”. Abstaining is aiding and abetting Authoritarianism.

    Reply
  • PK P 3 years ago

    Texas Taliban would love nothing more than to put women and girls in a closet and bring them out for rape and abuse only. Total morons

    Reply
  • Dave Prinsloo 3 years ago

    He needs to go. His references are westerns and posse’s. Go home old man

    Reply
  • Dave Prinsloo 3 years ago

    He doesn’t know what “diss” nor “mic drop” means. Go home old man

    Reply

Add your comment

Your email address will not be published.