RuPaul returns for his second night of guest hosting and talks about replicas of Jeff Bezos’ rocket going up for sale, Mediterranean diets helping to cure erectile dysfunction, we take to the street for kids to explain what a “Karen” is, This Week in Unnecessary Censorship, and RuPaul’s Plain Clothes Drag Show with Kimmel staffers.
Connect
Absolutely LOVED RUPAUL on here. One of THE BEST HOSTS. Who was the performer? “Give me my flowers whole I’m still here?”
ReplySweet!
ReplyBest. Guest. Host. Eva!
ReplyI love the idea of Rupaul having his own talk show, because some nights he could be wearing a sleek suit, and some nights he’d just show up in drag, and we’d be fine with it either way.
ReplyOh Ru! Okuuuurrrr!!!
ReplyAnyone else feel rupaul is a lot like Sheldon from Big Bang theory
Replyhe is hilarious and natural comic timing. yea rupaul
ReplyBelly is on this episode! I hope Belly does their best song ever – “Feed the Tree”
Replyi had the pleasure to watch him with my ex… does he realy have to show up here 😉
Replyshantay in indonesian means relax or chilling
ReplyThe Yomiuri Shimbun reported on the 25th that Tokyo Electric Power Corporation has decided to discharge contaminated water from the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant in Japan, where a large amount of radioactive material was leaked, into the sea about 1km away from the nuclear power plant.
According to the report, TEPCO plans to build an undersea tunnel and discharge contaminated water containing radioactive materials into the sea 1 km away from the nuclear power plant. Japan plans to submit a tunnel construction plan to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission by the end of next month with the goal of discharging contaminated water from the spring of 2023.
Previously, the Japanese government announced that there was no more space to store the contaminated water accumulated since the nuclear accident caused by the Great East Japan Earthquake in April 2011. Since then, the authorities have considered discharging the contaminated water directly from the shore and discharging it through an undersea tunnel. TEPCO plans to reduce the risk of radioactive materials by diluting and discharging contaminated water. There is also an analysis that the decision was made with the external image in mind. A Japanese government official told the Yomiuri Shimbun, “It costs a lot to build, but the discharge through an undersea tunnel will give a better impression (for Japan).”
Concerns are growing in neighboring countries including Korea and China due to Japan’s discharge of contaminated water. This is because tritium, a radioactive material, remains in the contaminated water even after purification, and it can flow into the oceans of neighboring countries.
Tritium, a radioactive material, is much smaller than a water molecule and has the same chemical properties, so it cannot be separated from water. This means that if it is released into the sea, it will contaminate marine life as it is.
Tritium, which enters the body through food or air, such as ingestion of seafood, is fatal in that even a small amount can damage DNA. When tritium pushes out normal hydrogen in the human body and causes nuclide conversion, the gene is modified and cells are destroyed, causing various cancers or lowering reproductive function.
There is concern that even if the concentration of pollution is lowered, the total amount will remain the same if released for a long period of time, adversely affecting the ecosystem.
If anxiety grows, the economy may suffer, such as a sharp drop in fish consumption in the market and a slump in the fishery industry.
Greenpeace, an international environmental group, suggested an alternative to storing tritium in a tank for a certain period of time and then releasing it when the level of contamination decreases, as the half-life of tritium radiation is halved by 12.3 years.
However, despite this, the Japanese government insists on ocean discharge for reasons such as cost.
ReplyLoved it too funny
ReplyLove this suit! Very few people could pull it off successfully, but RuPaul def can!
Reply