Ernest Moniz on Nuclear Threats | Real Time with Bill Maher (HBO)

20872

33 comments

  • Thai Densetsu 3 months ago

    Can’t believe this is happening in 2022 with all the information and science in existence.

    Reply
  • Chance Robinson 3 months ago

    Losing a Nuke = Military Intelligence. It’s that simple.

    Reply
  • Trace Smith 3 months ago

    I know nothing of war…EVERY DAMN DAY there is a Hitler show on nat. Geo ,history or discovery. 76 years of the same shit. We know it all already for God sakes.
    Any who…I read of espionage, double agents,spies , technology…and intelligent? So WHY WHY aren’t we using targeted missiles to get putin and 100 of his closest minions ALL at the same time. What the hell. What do they spend the billions of military dollars on.
    He’ll fire…I know what that is…and I swear I’ve I was 30 years younger…this grandma would be the 1st one in line to go up and drop on on the Kremlin then the red square. Can’t have my kids and grandkids growing up with lunatics like trumputin,Maduro,short round and all the communist leaders of China. Their all fucking crazy wit power and no thought for the people they serve….targeted misses…do it. No I’m not crazy…just tired of malevolent fungus ruining the planet.

    Reply
  • nathanael morris 3 months ago

    You’re cheering for what

    Reply
  • Misty Meaner 3 months ago

    That guy’s hair is a little disturbing…
    Lol

    Reply
  • Robert Alaverdov 3 months ago

    Nuclear war casualty estimates: 5 to 7.5 billion. Short version: worldwide fallout, nuclear winter, breakdown of the food chain, mass extinction and possible extinction of the human species.

    Long version: Total nuclear exchange between belligerent powers could potentially involve in its entirety detonations in excess of 5k megatons over significant portions of the northern hemisphere. Initial death toll within 24 hours is estimated at 300-500 million with variances dependent on use of fallout shelters and evacuation procedures. Both atmospheric and ground impact detonations are expected to produce a significant number of EMP (electromagnetic pulse) discharges at various ranges. These would render most digital and electronic devices inoperable. This includes a majority of ground, aerial and marine transport. Follow on casualties from injuries such as severe burns, those trapped in collapsed buildings, patients with electronic medical devices such as pacemakers and others would account for a further 100-200 million deaths shortly thereafter. Past this point casualties would continue to increase as a further 400-700 million are expected to succumb to radiation poisoning and cancer in the proceeding weeks and months. A substantial number of these fatalities are expected outside the belligerent powers borders as radioactive particles are spread globally via atmospheric currents.
    Secondarily as a result of runaway firestorms in both urban and rural areas; a nuclear winter may result from the injection of soot, particularly black carbon entering the upper atmosphere is expected to lower global temperatures between 11C to 22C for a period of 3-5 years under optimistic projections. With some modeling showing global temperatures being affected for periods extending several decades. The result of this drastic temperature change is expected to deplete farm yields in excess of 80-90% causing a further 4-6 billion global fatalities due to starvation. With the casualty variation being highly dependent on proper use of food stocks and rationing from the remaining populace.
    Further still the majority of industrial fertilizer and agricultural equipment manufacture, that is responsible for the consequential increase in crop yields of the past century is located within the belligerent countries territories. Studies estimating planetary carrying capacity using preindustrial agriculture practices provide a range of 600-800 million as sustainable in terms of global population. Released data from belligerent parties war plans cite the destruction of fertile agricultural regions as a priority. And with the majority of planetary arable farmland located within the targeted northern hemisphere. Along with the effects of nuclear winter, planetary carrying capacity would be significantly reduced. With some modeling predicting as few as 100-200 million being sustainable. In addition ocean fauna would also be dangerous to consume as rain/snow runoff funnels radioactive material along with debris containing large concentrations of lead and other heavy elements into coastal waters.
    With the destruction of much of the northern hemisphere global trade would for all intents and purposes cease to function. As all major ports, navigable rivers and highways within the belligerent states intersect economic zones that would now be impassable due to radioactive contamination and debris. As per UN food sustainability studies between 58%-62% of countries are dependent on food imports. Even within countries classified as food sustainable estimates put 70%-74% of populations further than 200km (a weeks travel by horse-cart) of their respective food producing regions. As most produce is perishable within a few days without refrigeration this would create a supply bottleneck for isolated population centers. A further strain on food distribution would be the loss of major fuel refining facilities based within the impacted countries. Fuel shortages would compound already strained food stocks leading to a breakdown in the supply chain.
    Under these conditions remaining governments would face a monumental task in attempting to maintain law and order. Possibly resulting in the breakdown of civil society and extreme lawlessness across the globe. Rate of homicides during this period can’t be calculated with certainty but expected to be significant. Additionally the majority of pharmaceutical manufacturing for both antivirals and antibiotics, along with medical equipment is produced by the belligerent countries. Loss of these facilities would compound the spread of disease along with the subsequent conditions. Further adding to the substantial number of unpredictable fatalities.
    Lastly even survivors who may have been fortunate enough to escape the destruction in underground bunkers will face extreme difficulty upon emerging onto the surface. As once food stocks are depleted they will have to grow crops in irradiated soil and without pollination. Most crops such as wheat, barley, corn, fruit and nut trees, etc., all require bee pollination. Bees have a particular sensory modality allowing them to detect electric fields. And thus they are especially susceptible to large amounts of electromagnetic radiation. The drastic temperature changes along with surface radiation will likely render them and most terrestrial animals extinct. Along with a significant portion of marine life. It is outside the scope of this report to predict a time frame for the reemergence of global civilization. Final estimate for a total nuclear exchange is between 5 to 7.5 billion casualties. With a moderate chance of complete human extinction.

    A strange game, the only winning move is not to play. -Joshua/WOPR

    Reply
  • Corky VanderHaven 3 months ago

    Waste of time
    What could have been somewhat informative

    Reply
  • Dand AinTac 3 months ago

    Furthermore, not only could “Star Wars” not hope to protect against a full ICBM barrage, but it also cannot protect against cruise missiles, short-range tactical nukes, or even a small nuke on a Boston Whaler sailed up the Potomac. It ‘s a pipe dream thinking we could have a shield in space to protect us. It would be a Maginot Line in the Sky, that would merely give us the conceit of protection, when a true determined adversary could just go around it.

    Reply
  • Daniel Diaz 3 months ago

    I have a feeling that Putin found our lost nuclear I’m, and has it aimed at us. I don’t put anything past that crazy weasel. Just kidding.

    Reply
  • Steve Johnson 3 months ago

    That Bill Maher and a Former Sec. of Energy are having a serious conversation about nuclear war scares me shitless. What the fuck are we doing? Are we thinking? And I would add the guest, Dr. Moniz, knows all the answers vis-à-vis nuclear weapons be they lost or not because nuclear weapon security is one if not the most important role of SOE.

    Reply
  • mudit Chaudhary 3 months ago

    Which scares me more then a sociopath who wants to live longer having nuke is a terrorist having a nuke who doesn’t have any regards for his own life and if we will not become serious towards situation in Pakistan we will see that day very much soon.

    Reply
  • dalisllama 3 months ago

    This guy looks like he visits a Virginian barber from 1777

    Reply
  • Natalya Woop 3 months ago

    It seemed to go over Bill’s head that the “small bomb” the guy talked about was still 2500 times bigger than the Oklahoma city bomb.

    Reply
  • Chris Andersen 3 months ago

    😳

    Reply
  • Rexx 3 months ago

    In the thumbnail I thought that was Michio Kaku

    Reply
  • Maj_Cyric 3 months ago

    So when we gonna get a “reboot” of the Bert the Turtle PSA?

    Reply
  • David Techau 3 months ago

    Remember when Putie put a bounty on US soldiers in Afghanistan? I think a billion bucks should do the trick. Come on Elon. Put your money where your mouth is.

    Reply
  • carla dehaas 3 months ago

    The ony real solution is for everyone to actually give up their nuclear weapons, & not make new ones. [ Where the Hell would they be stored?]

    Reply
  • Jedii Kniight 3 months ago

    My fart went back up into me, and now I can taste it. Thank you for this video. 😟😔

    Reply
  • goyari4224 3 months ago

    𝐈 𝐠𝐞𝐭 𝐩𝐚𝐢𝐝 𝐨𝐯𝐞𝐫 $𝟏𝟗𝟎 𝐩𝐞𝐫 𝐡𝐨𝐮𝐫 𝐰𝐨𝐫𝐤𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐟𝐫𝐨𝐦 𝐡𝐨𝐦𝐞 𝐰𝐢𝐭𝐡 𝟐 𝐤𝐢𝐝𝐬 𝐚𝐭 𝐡𝐨𝐦𝐞. 𝐈 𝐧𝐞𝐯𝐞𝐫 𝐭𝐡𝐨𝐮𝐠𝐡𝐭 𝐈’𝐝 𝐛𝐞 𝐚𝐛𝐥𝐞 𝐭𝐨 𝐝𝐨 𝐢𝐭 𝐛𝐮𝐭 𝐦𝐲 𝐛𝐞𝐬𝐭 𝐟𝐫𝐢𝐞𝐧𝐝 𝐞𝐚𝐫𝐧𝐬 𝐨𝐯𝐞𝐫 𝟏𝟓𝐤 𝐚 𝐦𝐨𝐧𝐭𝐡 𝐝𝐨𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐭𝐡𝐢𝐬 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐬𝐡𝐞 𝐜𝐨𝐧𝐯𝐢𝐧𝐜𝐞𝐝 𝐦𝐞 𝐭𝐨 𝐭𝐫𝐲. 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐩𝐨𝐭𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐢𝐚𝐥 𝐰𝐢𝐭𝐡 𝐭𝐡𝐢𝐬 𝐢𝐬 𝐞𝐧𝐝𝐥𝐞𝐬𝐬…☛☛☛☛☛☛☛☛ 𝐰𝐰𝐰.𝐰𝐨𝐫𝐤𝐬𝐜𝐥𝐢𝐜𝐤.𝐜𝐨𝐦

    Reply
  • Pamela Foley 3 months ago

    I am making $390/hour telecommuting. I never imagined that it was honest to goodness yet my closest companion is earning $21 thousand a month by working on the web, that was truly shocking for me, she prescribed me to attempt it simply ,

    COPY AND OPEN THIS SITE ……>> W­­­W­­­W­­­.N­­­E­­­T­­­C­­­A­­­S­­­H­­­1.C­­­O­­­M

    Reply
  • Camelia 3 months ago

    𝐈 𝐦𝐚𝐤𝐞 𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐞 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐧 $𝟏𝟐,𝟎𝟎𝟎 𝐚 𝐦𝐨𝐧𝐭𝐡 𝐨𝐧𝐥𝐢𝐧𝐞. 𝐈𝐭’𝐬 𝐞𝐧𝐨𝐮𝐠𝐡 𝐭𝐨 𝐜𝐨𝐦𝐟𝐨𝐫𝐭𝐚𝐛𝐥𝐲 𝐫𝐞𝐩𝐥𝐚𝐜𝐞 𝐦𝐲 𝐨𝐥𝐝 𝐣𝐨𝐛𝐬 𝐢𝐧𝐜𝐨𝐦𝐞, 𝐞𝐬𝐩𝐞𝐜𝐢𝐚𝐥𝐥𝐲 𝐜𝐨𝐧𝐬𝐢𝐝𝐞𝐫𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐈 𝐨𝐧𝐥𝐲 𝐰𝐨𝐫𝐤 𝐚𝐛𝐨𝐮𝐭 𝟏𝟏 𝐭𝐨 𝟏𝟐 𝐡𝐨𝐮𝐫𝐬 𝐚 𝐰𝐞𝐞𝐤 𝐟𝐫𝐨𝐦 𝐡𝐨𝐦𝐞. 𝐈 𝐰𝐚𝐬 𝐚𝐦𝐚𝐳𝐞𝐝 𝐡𝐨𝐰 𝐞𝐚𝐬𝐲 𝐢𝐭 𝐰𝐚𝐬 𝐚𝐟𝐭𝐞𝐫 𝐈 𝐭𝐫𝐢𝐞𝐝 𝐢𝐭… 🙂 𝐀𝐍𝐃 𝐆𝐎𝐎𝐃 𝐋𝐔𝐂𝐊.:)

    𝐇𝐄𝐑𝐄====)> 𝐰𝐰𝐰.𝐰𝐨𝐫𝐤𝐬𝐟𝐮𝐥.𝐜𝐨𝐦

    Reply
  • xapey54803 3 months ago

    𝐈 𝐠𝐞𝐭 𝐩𝐚𝐢𝐝 𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐞 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐧 $𝟗𝟎 𝐭𝐨 $𝟏𝟎𝟎 𝐩𝐞𝐫 𝐡𝐨𝐮𝐫 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐰𝐨𝐫𝐤𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐨𝐧𝐥𝐢𝐧𝐞. 𝐈 𝐡𝐞𝐚𝐫𝐝 𝐚𝐛𝐨𝐮𝐭 𝐭𝐡𝐢𝐬 𝐣𝐨𝐛 𝟑 𝐦𝐨𝐧𝐭𝐡𝐬 𝐚𝐠𝐨 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐚𝐟𝐭𝐞𝐫 𝐣𝐨𝐢𝐧𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐭𝐡𝐢𝐬 𝐈 𝐡𝐚𝐯𝐞 𝐞𝐚𝐫𝐧𝐞𝐝 𝐞𝐚𝐬𝐢𝐥𝐲 $𝟏𝟎𝐤 𝐟𝐫𝐨𝐦 𝐭𝐡𝐢𝐬 𝐰𝐢𝐭𝐡𝐨𝐮𝐭 𝐡𝐚𝐯𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐨𝐧𝐥𝐢𝐧𝐞 𝐰𝐨𝐫𝐤𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐬𝐤𝐢𝐥𝐥𝐬 . 𝐒𝐢𝐦𝐩𝐥𝐲 𝐠𝐢𝐯𝐞 𝐢𝐭 𝐚 𝐬𝐡𝐨𝐭 𝐨𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐚𝐜𝐜𝐨𝐦𝐩𝐚𝐧𝐲𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐬𝐢𝐭𝐞…
    𝐇𝐄𝐑𝐄====)> 𝐰𝐰𝐰.𝐄𝐚𝐬𝐲𝐰𝐨𝐫𝐤𝟐.𝐜𝐨𝐦/

    Reply
  • James114 3 months ago

    𝑰 𝒂𝒎 𝒎𝒂𝒌𝒊𝒏𝒈 $150 𝒆𝒗𝒆𝒓𝒚 𝒉𝒐𝒖𝒓 𝒃𝒚 𝒘𝒐𝒓𝒌𝒊𝒏𝒈 𝒐𝒏 𝒕𝒉𝒆 𝒘𝒆𝒃 𝒂𝒕 𝒉𝒐𝒎𝒆. 𝑨 𝒎𝒐𝒏𝒕𝒉 𝒂𝒈𝒐 𝑰 𝒉𝒂𝒗𝒆 𝒈𝒐𝒕𝒕𝒆𝒏 $19723 𝒇𝒓𝒐𝒎 𝒕𝒉𝒊𝒔 𝒂𝒄𝒕𝒊𝒗𝒊𝒕𝒚. 𝑻𝒉𝒊𝒔 𝒂𝒄𝒕𝒊𝒗𝒊𝒕𝒚 𝒊𝒔 𝒆𝒙𝒄𝒆𝒑𝒕𝒊𝒐𝒏𝒂𝒍𝒍𝒚 𝒂𝒔𝒕𝒐𝒖𝒏𝒅𝒊𝒏𝒈 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒊𝒕𝒔 𝒏𝒐𝒓𝒎𝒂𝒍 𝒊𝒏𝒄𝒐𝒎𝒆 𝒇𝒐𝒓 𝒎𝒆 𝒊𝒔 𝒔𝒖𝒑𝒆𝒓𝒊𝒐𝒓 𝒕𝒐 𝒂𝒏𝒚𝒕𝒉𝒊𝒏𝒈 𝒎𝒚 𝒑𝒂𝒔𝒕 𝒐𝒇𝒇𝒊𝒄𝒆 𝒘𝒐𝒓𝒌. 𝑻𝒉𝒊𝒔 𝒂𝒄𝒕𝒊𝒗𝒊𝒕𝒚 𝒊𝒔 𝒇𝒐𝒓 𝒂𝒍𝒍 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒆𝒗𝒆𝒓𝒚𝒐𝒏𝒆 𝒄𝒂𝒏 𝒘𝒊𝒕𝒉𝒐𝒖𝒕 𝒎𝒖𝒄𝒉 𝒐𝒇 𝒂 𝒔𝒕𝒓𝒆𝒕𝒄𝒉 𝒋𝒐𝒊𝒏 𝒕𝒉𝒊𝒔 𝒄𝒐𝒓𝒓𝒆𝒄𝒕 𝒏𝒐𝒘 𝒃𝒚 𝒖𝒕𝒊𝒍𝒊𝒛𝒆 𝒕𝒉𝒊𝒔 𝒍𝒊𝒏𝒌. 𝑪𝒐𝒑𝒚 𝑯𝒆𝒓𝒆……===))> 𝒘𝒘𝒘.𝒇𝒖𝒍𝒋𝒐𝒃𝒛.𝒄𝒐𝒎

    Reply
  • nayiwar 3 months ago

    𝐈 𝐦𝐚𝐤𝐞 𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐞 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐧 $𝟏𝟐,𝟎𝟎𝟎 𝐚 𝐦𝐨𝐧𝐭𝐡 𝐨𝐧𝐥𝐢𝐧𝐞. 𝐈𝐭’𝐬 𝐞𝐧𝐨𝐮𝐠𝐡 𝐭𝐨 𝐜𝐨𝐦𝐟𝐨𝐫𝐭𝐚𝐛𝐥𝐲 𝐫𝐞𝐩𝐥𝐚𝐜𝐞 𝐦𝐲 𝐨𝐥𝐝 𝐣𝐨𝐛𝐬 𝐢𝐧𝐜𝐨𝐦𝐞, 𝐞𝐬𝐩𝐞𝐜𝐢𝐚𝐥𝐥𝐲 𝐜𝐨𝐧𝐬𝐢𝐝𝐞𝐫𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐈 𝐨𝐧𝐥𝐲 𝐰𝐨𝐫𝐤 𝐚𝐛𝐨𝐮𝐭 𝟏𝟏 𝐭𝐨 𝟏𝟐 𝐡𝐨𝐮𝐫𝐬 𝐚 𝐰𝐞𝐞𝐤 𝐟𝐫𝐨𝐦 𝐡𝐨𝐦𝐞. 𝐈 𝐰𝐚𝐬 𝐚𝐦𝐚𝐳𝐞𝐝 𝐡𝐨𝐰 𝐞𝐚𝐬𝐲 𝐢𝐭 𝐰𝐚𝐬 𝐚𝐟𝐭𝐞𝐫 𝐈 𝐭𝐫𝐢𝐞𝐝 𝐢𝐭…𝐆𝐎𝐎𝐃 𝐋𝐔𝐂𝐊..
    🙂 𝐀𝐍𝐃 𝐆𝐎𝐎𝐃 𝐋𝐔𝐂𝐊.:) 𝐇𝐄𝐑𝐄====)> 𝐖𝐰𝐰.𝐇𝐨𝐦𝐳𝐣𝐨𝐛.𝐂𝐨𝐦

    Reply
  • DeliaFullwood 3 months ago

    𝐆𝐨𝐨𝐠𝐥𝐞 𝐢𝐬 𝐩𝐫𝐞𝐬𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐥𝐲 𝐩𝐚𝐲𝐢𝐧𝐠 $𝟏𝟎𝟒𝟒𝟕 𝐭𝐨 $𝟏𝟑𝟎𝟐𝟓 𝐞𝐯𝐞𝐫𝐲 𝐦𝐨𝐧𝐭𝐡 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐰𝐨𝐫𝐤𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐨𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐰𝐞𝐛 𝐟𝐫𝐨𝐦 𝐡𝐨𝐦𝐞. 𝐈 𝐡𝐚𝐯𝐞 𝐣𝐨𝐢𝐧𝐞𝐝 𝐭𝐡𝐢𝐬 𝐚𝐜𝐭𝐢𝐯𝐢𝐭𝐲 𝟐 𝐦𝐨𝐧𝐭𝐡𝐬 𝐛𝐚𝐜𝐤 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐈 𝐡𝐚𝐯𝐞 𝐞𝐚𝐫𝐧𝐞𝐝 $𝟏𝟓𝟐𝟒𝟖 𝐢𝐧 𝐦𝐲 𝐟𝐢𝐫𝐬𝐭 𝐦𝐨𝐧𝐭𝐡 𝐟𝐫𝐨𝐦 𝐭𝐡𝐢𝐬 𝐚𝐜𝐭𝐢𝐯𝐢𝐭𝐲. 𝐈 𝐜𝐚𝐧 𝐬𝐚𝐲 𝐦𝐲 𝐥𝐢𝐟𝐞 𝐢𝐬 𝐢𝐦𝐩𝐫𝐨𝐯𝐞𝐝 𝐭𝐨𝐭𝐚𝐥𝐥𝐲! 𝐋𝐨𝐨𝐤 𝐚𝐭 𝐢𝐭 𝐰𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐈 𝐝𝐨…. 𝐰𝐰𝐰.𝐩𝐚𝐲𝐬𝟏𝟏.𝐜𝐨𝐦

    Reply
  • SusanneHarris 3 months ago

    𝐅𝐢𝐧𝐚𝐥𝐥𝐲 𝐈 𝐦𝐚𝐝𝐞 $𝟗𝟐/𝐡𝐫. 𝐈𝐭’𝐬 𝐭𝐢𝐦𝐞 𝐭𝐨 𝐭𝐚𝐤𝐞 𝐬𝐨𝐦𝐞 𝐚𝐜𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐲𝐨𝐮 𝐜𝐚𝐧 𝐣𝐨𝐢𝐧 𝐢𝐭 𝐭𝐨𝐨. 𝐈𝐭 𝐢𝐬 𝐚 𝐬𝐢𝐦𝐩𝐥𝐞, 𝐝𝐞𝐝𝐢𝐜𝐚𝐭𝐞𝐝 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐞𝐚𝐬𝐲 𝐰𝐚𝐲 𝐭𝐨 𝐠𝐞𝐭 𝐫𝐢𝐜𝐡. 𝐓𝐡𝐫𝐞𝐞 𝐰𝐞𝐞𝐤𝐬 𝐟𝐫𝐨𝐦 𝐧𝐨𝐰 𝐲𝐨𝐮 𝐰𝐢𝐥𝐥 𝐰𝐢𝐬𝐡 𝐲𝐨𝐮 𝐡𝐚𝐝 𝐬𝐭𝐚𝐫𝐭𝐞𝐝 𝐭𝐨𝐝𝐚𝐲. 𝐒𝐢𝐦𝐩𝐥𝐲 𝐠𝐢𝐯𝐞 𝐢𝐭 𝐚 𝐬𝐡𝐨𝐭 𝐨𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐚𝐜𝐜𝐨𝐦𝐩𝐚𝐧𝐲𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐬𝐢𝐭𝐞.……>>W­­w­­w­­.W­­o­­r­­k­­S­­i­­t­­e­­2­­4.C­­o­­m

    Reply
  • sitem56628 3 months ago

    𝐈 𝐠𝐞𝐭 𝐩𝐚𝐢𝐝 𝐨𝐯𝐞𝐫 $𝟏𝟗𝟎 𝐩𝐞𝐫 𝐡𝐨𝐮𝐫 𝐰𝐨𝐫𝐤𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐟𝐫𝐨𝐦 𝐡𝐨𝐦𝐞 𝐰𝐢𝐭𝐡 𝟐 𝐤𝐢𝐝𝐬 𝐚𝐭 𝐡𝐨𝐦𝐞. 𝐈 𝐧𝐞𝐯𝐞𝐫 𝐭𝐡𝐨𝐮𝐠𝐡𝐭 𝐈’𝐝 𝐛𝐞 𝐚𝐛𝐥𝐞 𝐭𝐨 𝐝𝐨 𝐢𝐭 𝐛𝐮𝐭 𝐦𝐲 𝐛𝐞𝐬𝐭 𝐟𝐫𝐢𝐞𝐧𝐝 𝐞𝐚𝐫𝐧𝐬 𝐨𝐯𝐞𝐫 𝟏𝟎𝐤 𝐚 𝐦𝐨𝐧𝐭𝐡 𝐝𝐨𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐭𝐡𝐢𝐬 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐬𝐡𝐞 𝐜𝐨𝐧𝐯𝐢𝐧𝐜𝐞𝐝 𝐦𝐞 𝐭𝐨 𝐭𝐫𝐲. 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐩𝐨𝐭𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐢𝐚𝐥 𝐰𝐢𝐭𝐡 𝐭𝐡𝐢𝐬 𝐢𝐬 𝐞𝐧𝐝𝐥𝐞𝐬𝐬. 𝐇𝐞𝐫𝐞’𝐬 𝐰𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐈’𝐯𝐞 𝐛𝐞𝐞𝐧 𝐝𝐨𝐢𝐧𝐠..

    𝐂𝐨𝐩𝐲 𝐇𝐄𝐑𝐄 ===))> 𝐰𝐰.𝐬𝐚𝐥𝐚𝐫𝐲𝐛𝐚𝐚𝐫.𝐜𝐨𝐦

    Reply
  • CarolYonker 3 months ago

    I am making $162/hour telecommuting. I never imagined that it was honest to goodness yet my closest companion is earning $21 thousand a month by working on the web, that was truly shocking for me, she prescribed me to attempt it simply ,
    COPY AND OPEN THIS SITE ……>> W­­­W­­­W­­­.N­­­E­­­T­­­C­­­A­­­S­­­H­­­1.C­­­O­­­M

    Reply
  • Shirley 3 months ago

    𝐈 𝐦𝐚𝐤𝐞 𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐞 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐧 $𝟏𝟐,𝟎𝟎𝟎 𝐚 𝐦𝐨𝐧𝐭𝐡 𝐨𝐧𝐥𝐢𝐧𝐞. 𝐈𝐭’𝐬 𝐞𝐧𝐨𝐮𝐠𝐡 𝐭𝐨 𝐜𝐨𝐦𝐟𝐨𝐫𝐭𝐚𝐛𝐥𝐲 𝐫𝐞𝐩𝐥𝐚𝐜𝐞 𝐦𝐲 𝐨𝐥𝐝 𝐣𝐨𝐛𝐬 𝐢𝐧𝐜𝐨𝐦𝐞, 𝐞𝐬𝐩𝐞𝐜𝐢𝐚𝐥𝐥𝐲 𝐜𝐨𝐧𝐬𝐢𝐝𝐞𝐫𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐈 𝐨𝐧𝐥𝐲 𝐰𝐨𝐫𝐤 𝐚𝐛𝐨𝐮𝐭 𝟏𝟏 𝐭𝐨 𝟏𝟐 𝐡𝐨𝐮𝐫𝐬 𝐚 𝐰𝐞𝐞𝐤 𝐟𝐫𝐨𝐦 𝐡𝐨𝐦𝐞. 𝐈 𝐰𝐚𝐬 𝐚𝐦𝐚𝐳𝐞𝐝 𝐡𝐨𝐰 𝐞𝐚𝐬𝐲 𝐢𝐭 𝐰𝐚𝐬 𝐚𝐟𝐭𝐞𝐫 𝐈 𝐭𝐫𝐢𝐞𝐝 𝐢𝐭…𝐆𝐎𝐎𝐃 𝐋𝐔𝐂𝐊..

    🙂 𝐀𝐍𝐃 𝐆𝐎𝐎𝐃 𝐋𝐔𝐂𝐊.:) 𝐇𝐄𝐑𝐄====)> 𝐖𝐖𝐖.𝐂𝐀𝐒𝐇𝟒𝟔.𝐂𝐎𝐌

    Reply
  • George552 3 months ago

    𝑰 𝒂𝒎 𝒎𝒂𝒌𝒊𝒏𝒈 $150 𝒆𝒗𝒆𝒓𝒚 𝒉𝒐𝒖𝒓 𝒃𝒚 𝒘𝒐𝒓𝒌𝒊𝒏𝒈 𝒐𝒏 𝒕𝒉𝒆 𝒘𝒆𝒃 𝒂𝒕 𝒉𝒐𝒎𝒆. 𝑨 𝒎𝒐𝒏𝒕𝒉 𝒂𝒈𝒐 𝑰 𝒉𝒂𝒗𝒆 𝒈𝒐𝒕𝒕𝒆𝒏 $19723 𝒇𝒓𝒐𝒎 𝒕𝒉𝒊𝒔 𝒂𝒄𝒕𝒊𝒗𝒊𝒕𝒚. 𝑻𝒉𝒊𝒔 𝒂𝒄𝒕𝒊𝒗𝒊𝒕𝒚 𝒊𝒔 𝒆𝒙𝒄𝒆𝒑𝒕𝒊𝒐𝒏𝒂𝒍𝒍𝒚 𝒂𝒔𝒕𝒐𝒖𝒏𝒅𝒊𝒏𝒈 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒊𝒕𝒔 𝒏𝒐𝒓𝒎𝒂𝒍 𝒊𝒏𝒄𝒐𝒎𝒆 𝒇𝒐𝒓 𝒎𝒆 𝒊𝒔 𝒔𝒖𝒑𝒆𝒓𝒊𝒐𝒓 𝒕𝒐 𝒂𝒏𝒚𝒕𝒉𝒊𝒏𝒈 𝒎𝒚 𝒑𝒂𝒔𝒕 𝒐𝒇𝒇𝒊𝒄𝒆 𝒘𝒐𝒓𝒌. 𝑻𝒉𝒊𝒔 𝒂𝒄𝒕𝒊𝒗𝒊𝒕𝒚 𝒊𝒔 𝒇𝒐𝒓 𝒂𝒍𝒍 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒆𝒗𝒆𝒓𝒚𝒐𝒏𝒆 𝒄𝒂𝒏 𝒘𝒊𝒕𝒉𝒐𝒖𝒕 𝒎𝒖𝒄𝒉 𝒐𝒇 𝒂 𝒔𝒕𝒓𝒆𝒕𝒄𝒉 𝒋𝒐𝒊𝒏 𝒕𝒉𝒊𝒔 𝒄𝒐𝒓𝒓𝒆𝒄𝒕 𝒏𝒐𝒘 𝒃𝒚 𝒖𝒕𝒊𝒍𝒊𝒛𝒆 𝒕𝒉𝒊𝒔 𝒍𝒊𝒏𝒌. 𝑪𝒐𝒑𝒚 𝑯𝒆𝒓𝒆……===))> 𝒘𝒘𝒘.𝒇𝒖𝒍𝒋𝒐𝒃𝒛.𝒄𝒐𝒎

    Reply
  • janifer 3 months ago

    𝐈 𝐦𝐚𝐤𝐞 𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐞 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐧 $𝟏𝟐,𝟎𝟎𝟎 𝐚 𝐦𝐨𝐧𝐭𝐡 𝐨𝐧𝐥𝐢𝐧𝐞. 𝐈𝐭’𝐬 𝐞𝐧𝐨𝐮𝐠𝐡 𝐭𝐨 𝐜𝐨𝐦𝐟𝐨𝐫𝐭𝐚𝐛𝐥𝐲 𝐫𝐞𝐩𝐥𝐚𝐜𝐞 𝐦𝐲 𝐨𝐥𝐝 𝐣𝐨𝐛𝐬 𝐢𝐧𝐜𝐨𝐦𝐞, 𝐞𝐬𝐩𝐞𝐜𝐢𝐚𝐥𝐥𝐲 𝐜𝐨𝐧𝐬𝐢𝐝𝐞𝐫𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐈 𝐨𝐧𝐥𝐲 𝐰𝐨𝐫𝐤 𝐚𝐛𝐨𝐮𝐭 𝟏𝟏 𝐭𝐨 𝟏𝟐 𝐡𝐨𝐮𝐫𝐬 𝐚 𝐰𝐞𝐞𝐤 𝐟𝐫𝐨𝐦 𝐡𝐨𝐦𝐞. 𝐈 𝐰𝐚𝐬 𝐚𝐦𝐚𝐳𝐞𝐝 𝐡𝐨𝐰 𝐞𝐚𝐬𝐲 𝐢𝐭 𝐰𝐚𝐬 𝐚𝐟𝐭𝐞𝐫 𝐈 𝐭𝐫𝐢𝐞𝐝 𝐢𝐭…
    🙂
    𝐀𝐍𝐃 𝐆𝐎𝐎𝐃 𝐋𝐔𝐂𝐊.:)

    𝐇𝐄𝐑𝐄====)> 𝐰𝐰𝐰.𝐡𝐦𝐣𝐨𝐛𝐳.𝐜𝐨𝐦

    Reply

Add your comment

Your email address will not be published.