Conan Interviews Kermit The Frog – “Late Night With Conan O’Brien”

Published on June 18, 2020

(Original airdate: 09/23/94) Kermit the Frog talks about his rumored romance with Miss Piggy and his album “Kermit Unpigged.” Watch more classic clips @

Category Tag


  • melvina628 7 months ago


  • Giselle 7 months ago

    I thought I have seem everything already but…

  • F E L I X 7 months ago

    Kermit’s throwing some shade at Piggy. Harsh.

  • jeane0253 7 months ago

    Yeah, interview Jordan Peterson when he is well again !

  • ollie wannell 7 months ago

    Howcome hes not sitting on the chair properly just rude

  • LoL LoL 7 months ago

    “I am better known as a singer than an actor, it’s kind of a frog thing”

    -Kermit the frog

  • MsPrincesspaulina 7 months ago

    Kermit is killing it here.

  • Raul Macias 7 months ago

    Love Kermit the Frog❤❤❤❤

  • Ethan Aleman 7 months ago

    Kermit is an American treasure

  • Aman Verma 7 months ago

    I’m i the only one admiring the puppetry skills…

  • Adi 7 months ago

    Young Conan had a very different laugh!

  • Swiss Media Stuff 7 months ago

    Who remembers Vomiting Kermit?

  • cmt_aaren 7 months ago

    Even in his youth, Conan had more talent and humour than Jimmy Fallon does currently.

  • txcforever 7 months ago

    It’s weird seeing Conan without his trademark haircut.

  • Galactic Cannibl 7 months ago

    You both aged well. Like a fine cheese or alter boy.

  • psuedospike 7 months ago

    This is from 800 years ago! 😮

  • Rogue Jedi 7 months ago

  • H8 GU 7 months ago

    Love Muppets and Conan.

  • mo_ Mgr 7 months ago

    If Jimmy Fallon can have a show for sure a frog can have a show. Mind you Kermit the frog is 100X more talented than Jimmy Fallon.

  • NightIsRight 7 months ago

    Talk about the Muppets going back to roots .

  • Geleeuw 7 months ago

    So Conan used to be funny.

  • Kuala Gl 7 months ago

    Does anybody know why Conan is not putting out any more videos? I’m getting worried for Coco…

  • Adder K. 7 months ago

    Thats not kermit.. This is horrible

  • Shawn&Inna Barrett 7 months ago


    oil spill 

    is natural material 

    bio digradable 

    when they find oil like this do they have a way to report???

    in Russia

    Highlighted reply

    Eugene Babitchev

    31 minutes ago

    Shawn&Inna Barrett I didn’t understand the gist of this spectacle, either. I want to see it in black and white on a piece of paper.


    Shawn&Inna Barrett

    1 second ago

    ​@Eugene Babitchev

    published electronically for people to view cause it is war or peace and paper burn easily

    i heard of sharovaya molnia

    is that true it can go through the glass ike this and leave a hole in the glass?

    at 20 seconds in the video they show this lightning inside th hoes it did not burn any glass or curtains 

    so how did it appear inside the apartment 

    why this person posts videos of some else and says it is himself

    was there 

    abusive father druggig a daughter by her foot?

    The legend of world gymnastics Olga Korbut took her place as an Olympic champion 4 times running. But  Korbut took her place in the history of sports after executing an unique element which later was named in her honor loop of Korbut. Here is already 44 years this complicated element prohibited in gymnastics.

    if it is a joke is very bad joke but gil see father and not really scared if she saw someone else she would struggle in terra but girl only terrified and calls why father is doing this

    what else is he doing 

    why he drugs her off to different room??

    where there is not camera

    they only have one camera in teh house??

    wha about parents living kids to gymnastics to be injured it should not be ok 

    liek this vinner irina

    chickens are nervous

    beak is filed

    why they valueboriginal is content avail on 


    could not they do training by internet or h had to show in person

    is like flying in lover

    from ukraine

    out of 5 lions

    there is one l o g o t y p e ?

    this woman hadn’t been working out and she has horrible hairstyle people today would laugh to see someone walking on the tweet with hairs like this

    she only looks good cause she is tall


    gorbachev perekladyval

    second p a r t

    walter f e r n a l d

  • Shawn&Inna Barrett 7 months ago


    Second Amendment

    In 2008, the Court considered a challenge to the gun laws in the District of Columbia. Scalia wrote the majority opinion in District of Columbia v. Heller, which found an individual right to own a firearm under the Second Amendment. Scalia traced the word “militia”, found in the Second Amendment, as it would have been understood at the time of its ratification, stating that it then meant “the body of all citizens”.[113] The Court upheld Heller’s claim to own a firearm in the District.[113]

    Scalia’s opinion for the Heller Court was criticized by liberals and applauded by conservatives.[114] Seventh Circuit Judge Richard Posner disagreed with Scalia’s opinion, stating that the Second Amendment “creates no right to the private possession of guns”. Posner called Scalia’s opinion “faux originalism” and a “historicizing glaze on personal values and policy preferences”.[115] In October 2008, Scalia stated that the court’s originalists needed to show only that at the time the Second Amendment was ratified, the right to bear arms did not have an exclusively military context and that they were successful in so showing.[116]

    In the 2013 case of Hollingsworth v. Perry, which involved a California ballot initiative known as Proposition 8 that amended the California State Constitution to ban same-sex marriage, Scalia voted with the majority to uphold a lower court decision overturning the ban. The decision was based on the appellants’ lack of standing to appeal and not on the substantive issue of the constitutionality of Proposition 8.[92]

    Also in 2013, Scalia dissented 

    from the majority opinion in United States v. Windsor. 

    In Windsor, the Court held Section Three of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) (which–for federal government purposes–defined the terms “marriage” and “spouse” as applicable only to opposite-sex unions) unconstitutional under the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment.[93] Scalia’s dissent, which was joined in full by Justice Thomas and in part by Chief Justice Roberts,[94] opened:

    This case is about power in several respects. 

    It is about the power of our people to govern themselves, 

    and the power of this Court to pronounce the law. 

    Today’s opinion aggrandizes the latter, 

    with the predictable consequence of diminishing the former. 

    We have no power to decide this case. 

    And even if we did, 

    we have no power under the Constitution 

    to invalidate this democratically adopted legislation.

    Scalia argued that the judgment 

    effectively characterized opponents of same-sex marriage as “enemies of the human race”:[95]

  • Shawn&Inna Barrett 7 months ago


    Senate Republicans (under Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell) 

    refused to consider Garland’s nomination, 

    holding “no hearings, no votes, no action whatsoever” on the nomination.[87][88] 

    The refusal was highly controversial, with some commentators saying the seat on the Court to which Garland was nominated was “stolen”.[89][90][91] 

    Over 170,000 people 

    how would all these people care 170K of them really care but any pricular judge???

    do you believe it??? see to be same tricks as in case with Rodger St

    signed a White House petition asking President Obama to independently appoint Garland to the Supreme Court, arguing that the Senate had waived its advise and consent role.[92] 

    On November 17, U.S. District Judge Rudolph Contreras threw out a lawsuit against Senator McConnell seeking to compel a vote on the nomination, finding that the plaintiff, who had simply alleged he was a voter, had no standing to sue.[92]

    Garland had more federal judicial experience than any other Supreme Court nominee in history,[33] and was the oldest Supreme Court nominee since Lewis F. Powell, Jr. in 1971.[93] The American Bar Association (ABA) Standing Committee on the Federal Judiciary unanimously rated Garland “well-qualified” (the Committee’s highest rating) to sit on the Supreme Court.[94]

    After a period of 293 days, Garland’s nomination expired on January 3, 2017 at the end of the 114th Congress.[95] On January 31, 2017, President Donald Trump nominated Neil Gorsuch to fill the Court vacancy.[96] On April 7, 2017, the Senate confirmed Gorsuch’s nomination to the Supreme Court.

    Financial disclosure forms in 2016 indicated that Garland’s net worth at the time was between $6 million and $23 million. 

    if Garland was doing 150K renovation on his house he woudl not be audited so why they bully some of thes people but not others?

    so this Neil is a horrible person 

    see he prevented implementing doctors performing abortions have admitting privileges in a hospital. That was antiabortion law and it is double negative every time. He sided with 3 judges voting to reject a temporary block at law restricting aborting. law restriction abortions is not any more temporary blocked so they restrict aoutthions there how now.. 

    In February 2019, Gorsuch sided with three of the court’s other conservative justices voting to reject a stay to temporarily block a law restricting abortion in Louisiana.[124] The law that the court temporarily stayed, in a 5–4 decision, would require that doctors performing abortions have admitting privileges in a hospital.[125]

    thsi next situation described is a mockery. The designs to be implemented required 4 votes and not 5. So teh 5th person swaying either way it irrelevant they need 6 judges and not 5 to decide anything. so if 4 judges vote yes and 5 judges vote no, yes still stands. so one judge voting yes, and 5 voting no.

    does it work the other way 

    it sounds that  4 people do not decide anything actually 

    so even in case with aboirtion him being 4th judge

    that means he was the one who actually made a difference by making the law to forbid aboirtions in Louisiana 

    cause they had 6 to 3 before he joined the 3 voting to support aborting law. 

    And when he sways 4 to 5 it is absolutely phony show off practice cause the decisions stays teh same it is only political creating appearance 

    in antiabortion he said no and it had worked. 

    So why is that they need 6 people and not 5??

    so thsi Judge now seem liek he is liberally minded, but in fact 4 to 5 changes really nothing exspet that he is showing he is siding with liberal party and not conservative judges. 

    Native American law

    In March 2019, Justice Gorsuch departed from his four fellow conservative Justices, joining the four more liberal Justices (in two plurality opinions) in a 5–4 majority in Washington State Dept. of Licensing v. Cougar Den, Inc.[126] 

    The Court’s decision sided with the Yakama Nation, 

    striking down a Washington State tax on transporting gasoline, 

    on the basis of an 1855 treaty in which the Yakama ceded a large portion of Washington in exchange for certain rights.[127] 

    In his concurrence, 

    which was joined by Justice Ginsburg, 

    Gorsuch ended his opinion by writing: 

    “Really, this case just tells an old and familiar story. 

    The State of Washington includes millions of acres that the Yakamas ceded 

    to the United States under significant pressure.

     In return, the government supplied a handful of modest promises. 

    The State is now dissatisfied with the consequences of one of those promises. 

    It is a new day, and now it wants more. But today and to its credit, the Court holds the parties to the terms of their deal. It is the least we can do.”[128]

    what did they just do?? did they just trade land for teh tax?? they said Yakama ceded a large portion of Washington so he talks in terms of acres of land in exchange for certain rigs. So he is saying that they allow Washington State tax not being payable to teh state of Washington in exvahge for certain right or in exchange for certain land 

    do they move the order of teh Washington state? because the nation is at the border? 

    In law, certiorari is a court process to seek judicial review of a decision of a lower court or government agency. Certiorari comes from the name of an English prerogative writ, issued by a superior court to direct that the record of the lower court be sent to the superior court for review. The term is Latin for “to be made certain”, and comes from the opening line of such writs, which traditionally began with the Latin words “Certiorari volumus…” (“We wish to be made certain…”).

    In a 7-2 decision, the Washington Supreme Court affirmed the lower decision, holding that the treaty preempted the state tax.[7] The Department then petitioned the United States Supreme Court, and the Court granted certiorari.[8]

    The Yakama Nation is an American Indian tribe in Washington, located on the Yakama Indian Reservation, on the east side of the Cascade Mountains. In 1855, the tribe signed the Yakama Nation Treaty of 1855, ceding approximately 10,000,000 acres to the United States, but reserving important rights for the tribe and its members. In the treaty, the tribe reserved “the right, in common with citizens of the United States, to travel upon all public highways.”[1]

    Cougar Den, Inc., was a corporation owned by the Yakama Nation, and which imported gasoline onto the reservation for sale to tribal members. The laws of the State of Washington imposed a tax on fuel imported into the state by truck,[2] which the tribe refused to pay. Washington, in 2013, assessed taxes and penalties of $3.6 million dollars against the tribe.[3] Cougar Den appealed the assessment.

  • Shawn&Inna Barrett 7 months ago


    The official investigation by the FBI, known as “OKBOMB”, resulted in their agents conducting 28,000 interviews, amassing 3.5 short tons (3,200 kg) of evidence, and collecting nearly one billion pieces of information.[15][16][17] The bombers were tried and convicted in 1997. Sentenced to death, McVeigh was executed by lethal injection on June 11, 2001 at the U.S. federal penitentiary in Terre Haute, Indiana. Nichols was sentenced to life in prison in 2004. Michael and Lori Fortier testified against McVeigh and Nichols; Michael Fortier was sentenced to 12 years in prison for failing to warn the United States government, and Lori received immunity from prosecution in exchange for her testimony.

    On April 14, 1995, McVeigh paid for a motel room at the Dreamland Motel in Junction City, Kansas.[48] The following day he rented a 1993 Ford F-700 truck from Ryder under the name Robert D. Kling, an alias he adopted because he knew an Army soldier named Kling with whom he shared physical characteristics, and because it reminded him of the Klingon warriors of Star Trek.[48][49][50] On April 16, 1995, he drove to Oklahoma City with fellow conspirator Terry Nichols where he parked a getaway car, a yellow 1977 Mercury Marquis, several blocks away from the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building.[51] The nearby Regency Towers Apartments’ lobby security camera recorded images of Nichols’s blue 1984 GMC pickup truck on April 16.[52] After removing the license plate from the car, he left a note covering the Vehicle Identification Number (VIN) plate that read, “Not abandoned. Please do not tow. Will move by April 23. (Needs battery & cable).”[25][53] Both men then returned to Ka

    see is important for former military and making them angry when their car gets towed

    The Oklahoma City bombing was a domestic terrorist truck bombing of the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building[2] in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States, on April 19, 1995. Perpetrated by American terrorists, 


    Initially, the FBI had three hypotheses about responsibility for the bombing: international terrorists, possibly the same group that had carried out the World Trade Center bombing; a drug cartel, carrying out an act of vengeance against DEA agents in the building’s DEA office; and anti-government radicals attempting to start a rebellion against the federal government.[76]


    Improved security[edit]

    In the wake of the bombing and the chaotic evacuation which followed, the World Trade Center and many of the firms inside of it revamped emergency procedures, particularly with regard to evacuation of the towers. The New York Port Authority was to govern as the main security for the World Trade Center buildings. All packages were scanned at various checkpoints then sent up to the proper addressee. These policies played a role in evacuating the building during the September 11 attacks, which destroyed the towers.

    Free access to the roofs, which had enabled evacuation by police helicopter in the 1993 bombing, was ended soon after.[citation needed]

    Legal responsibility[edit]

    The victims of the 1993 World Trade Center bombings sued the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey for damages. A decision was handed down in 2005, assigning liability for the bombings to the Port Authority.[47] The decision declared that the agency was 68 percent responsible for the bombing, and the terrorists bore only 32 percent of the responsibility. In January 2008, the Port Authority asked a five-judge panel of the Appellate Division of the New York State Supreme Court in Manhattan to throw out the decision, describing the jury’s verdict as “bizarre”.[48] On April 29, 2008, a New York State Appeals Court unanimously upheld the jury’s verdict. Under New York law, once a defendant is more than 50 percent at fault, he/she/it can be held fully financially liable.[49] On September 22, 2011, the New York Court of Appeals, in a four to three ruling, excluded the Port Authority from claims of negligence related to the 1993 bombing.[50]

    It has been argued that the problem with the apportionment of responsibility in the case is not the jury’s verdict, but rather New York’s tort-reform-produced state apportionment law. Traditionally, courts do not compare intentional and negligent fault. The Restatement Third of Torts: Apportionment of Liability recommends a rule to prevent juries from having to make comparisons like the terrorist–Port Authority comparison in this case.[51] However, if a jurisdiction does compare these intentional and negligent torts, courts’ second-best position is to do what the NYS Appeals Court did—to uphold all jury apportionments, even those that assign greater, or perhaps far greater, responsibility to negligent than intentional parties.[52]

    Also ou see they say 4 to 3 ruling 

    even there are 6 judged require dto win they do not show the other two they only show 4 and they say 4 to 3

    they so useless they even calculate guilty verdict in percentages what do you think about it

    do you remember thsi bombing??

    According to the transcript of his trial, Yousef hoped that his explosion would topple Tower 1 which would fall into Tower 2, killing the occupants of both buildings, which he estimated to be about 250,000 people[8] in revenge for U.S. support for Israel against Palestine.[9]

    According to the journalist Steve Coll, Yousef mailed letters to various New York newspapers just before the attack, in which he claimed he belonged to “Liberation Army, Fifth Battalion”.[10]

    These letters made three demands: an end to all US aid to Israel, an end to US diplomatic relations with Israel, and a pledge by the United States to end interference “with any of the Middle East countries’ interior affairs.” He stated that the attack on the World Trade Center would be merely the first of such attacks if his demands were not met. In his letters, Yousef admitted that the World Trade Center bombing was an act of terrorism, but this was justified because “the terrorism that Israel practices (which America supports) must be faced with a similar one.”[citation needed] Yousef did not make any religious justification for the bombing. When asked about his religious views, he was evasive.[11]

    ousef set up residence in Jersey City, New Jersey, traveled around New York and New Jersey and called Sheikh Omar Abdel-Rahman, a controversial blind Muslim cleric, via cell phone. After being introduced to his co-conspirators by Abdel Rahman at the latter’s Al-Farooq Mosque in Brooklyn, Yousef began assembling the 1,500 lb (680 kg) urea nitrate–hydrogen gas enhanced device for delivery to the WTC. He ordered chemicals from his hospital room when injured in a car crash – one of three accidents caused by Salameh in late 1992 and early in 1993.

    El Sayyid Nosair, one of the blind sheikh’s men, was arrested in 1991 for the murder of Rabbi Meir Kahane. According to prosecutors, “the Red” Mahmud Abouhalima, also convicted in the bombing, told Wadih el Hage to buy the .357 caliber revolver used by Nosair in the Kahane shooting. In the initial court case in NYS Criminal Court Nosair was acquitted of murder but convicted of gun charges (in a related and follow-up case in Federal Court, he was convicted). Dozens of Arabic bomb-making manuals and documents related to terrorist plots were found in Nosair’s New Jersey apartment, with manuals from Army Special Warfare Center at Fort Bragg, North Carolina, secret memos linked to the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and 1,440 rounds of ammunition. (Lance 2004 26)

  • Shawn&Inna Barrett 7 months ago


    The Turner Diaries is a 1978 novel by William Luther Pierce, published under the pseudonym Andrew Macdonald.[1] The Turner Diaries depicts a violent revolution in the United States which leads to the overthrow of the federal government, a nuclear war, and, ultimately, a race war which leads to the systematic extermination of non-whites.[2][3] All groups opposed by the novel’s protagonist, Earl Turner, including Jews, non-whites, “liberal actors” and politicians, are exterminated.[4]

    The Turner Diaries was described as “explicitly racist and anti-Semitic” by The New York Times and it has also been labeled the “bible of the racist right” by the Southern Poverty Law Center.[5][6] The book was greatly influential in shaping white nationalism and the later development of the white genocide theory. It has also inspired numerous hate crimes and acts of terrorism, including the 1995 Oklahoma City bombing, the 1999 London nail bombings, and the 1984 assassination of Alan Berg.[7][8][9]

    so they call non white 


    A framing device which takes place in 2099 (a hundred years after the events depicted) gives the novel’s main text a historical context, which is presented as the journal of Earl Turner, an active member of a white revolutionary movement. 

    As the story begins, 

    the federal government has confiscated all civilian firearms in the country under the Cohen Act. 

    Turner and his cohorts take their organization underground in order to wage a guerrilla war against the System, which is depicted as being under Jewish control.[4] 

    The “System” begins by implementing numerous repressive laws against various forms of hate, by making it a “hate crime” for white people to defend themselves when crimes are committed against them by non-whites 

    even after all weapons have been confiscated, 

    and pushing for new surveillance measures in order to monitor its citizens,

     such as requiring them to possess a special passport at all times and in all places in order to permanently monitor where individuals are. 

    The “Organization” starts its campaigns by committing acts such as the bombing of the FBI headquarters, then executing an ongoing, low-level campaign of resistance, assassination, and economic sabotage throughout the United States.

    Turner plays a large part in activities in the Washington, D.C. area. When the President of the United States delivers a speech denouncing racists and demanding that all members of the Organization be brought to justice, Turner and other Organization members launch mortars into the streets of Washington from far away, forcing the president and other government officials to be evacuated. In another scene, Turner witnesses an anti-racism parade in which whites who are not part of the parade are pulled aside and beaten (sometimes to death) by non-white marchers; the march eventually turns into a full-scale riot. Turner’s exploits lead to his initiation into the “Order”, a secret rebel group that consists of an elite group of masterminds of the revolution, who are secretly leading the Organization and whose existence remains unknown both to ordinary Organization members and the System

    the entire judicial system actually is to blame and the stupidity of it the greed the trickery and assumption that people are actually stupid

    and if they do not underhand fast enough they are lied to that they continue to be manipulated 

    During this time, the Organization raids a black sanctuary and discovers a cannibalism operation where blacks kidnap, butcher, and eat whites.

    The resulting racial conflict in the east causes many whites to “wake up” and begin fleeing to Southern California which now becomes a white sanctuary. Deliberately fomenting racial conflict is referred to as “demographic warfare” which begins bringing in new recruits to both the Organization and the Order.

    In an event which comes to be known as the “Day of the Rope” (August 1, 1993). Most of these public executions are filmed for propaganda purposes.[10][4] The Organization has little use for most white “mainstream” Americans. Those on the left are seen as dupes or willing agents of the Jews, while conservatives and libertarians are regarded as mere businessmen out for themselves or misguided fools, because, the Organization states, the Jews “took over according to the Constitution, fair and square.” Turner and his comrades save their special contempt for the ordinary people, who are seen to care about nothing beyond being kept comfortable and entertained. Once daily life is completely disrupted by the nuclear war it instigated, the Organization opens compounds where food and shelter are available – but those seeking admittance are given a bayonet and told to come back with “the freshly cut head of a non-white person”; those unable or unwilling to pay such an “admittance price” are left to starve, as their death would “improve the race”.

    The Organization then uses both

     its southern Californian base of operations 

    and its nuclear weapons to open a wider war in which it launches nuclear strikes against New York City and Israel, initiates a nuclear exchange between 

    the US and the Soviet Union, and plants nuclear weapons and new combat units throughout North America. Many major U.S. cities are destroyed, including Baltimore and Detroit. 

    While the United States is being engulfed in a nuclear civil war, governments all over the world begin to fall one by one, and violent anti-Jewish riots break out in the streets. After the nuclear weapons are launched against Israel and Tel Aviv is destroyed, the Arabs take advantage of the opportunity and proceed to swarm into Israel, mostly armed with clubs and knives, and kill all of the Israelis. 

    The governments of France and the Netherlands collapse, and the Soviet Union falls apart while it is seeing a surge in anti-Semitic violence. Meanwhile, the United States is put in a state of absolute martial law and transformed into a military dictatorship. 

    The United States government decides to launch an invasion of the Organization’s stronghold in Southern California. 

    The leaders of the Order now inform Earl Turner of his punishment for having failed to resist his Jewish interrogators during his captivity: he must pilot a crop duster equipped with a nuclear warhead and destroy the Pentagon in a kamikaze-type suicide-strike, before the invasion can be ordered.

    The epilogue summarizes how the Organization went on to conquer the rest of the world and how all non-white races were eliminated. Africa was invaded; all of its black inhabitants were killed. Puerto Ricans (described as a “repulsive mongrel race”) were killed and Puerto Rico was recolonized. After China attempts to invade European Russia, the Organization attacks its with nuclear, chemical, radiological and biological weapons which render the entire continent of Asia uninhabitable and rife with “mutants”. In the United States, the last remaining non-whites are hunted down, along with all of the individuals who are involved in organized crime (such as the Mafia).

    One of the last steps in the Organization’s victory is its truce with the remainder of the American military’s generals, who agree to surrender if the former swears not to harm them or their immediate families. 

    The Organization gladly accepts. The epilogue concludes with the statement that “just 110 years after the birth of the ‘Great One’, the dream of a white world finally became a certainty… and the Order would spread its wise and benevolent rule over the earth for all time to come.”[4]

    100 years later after birth of Hitler Barrack Obama enters occidental college fraternity

    Adolf Hitler (German: [ˈadɔlf ˈhɪtlɐ] (listen); 20 April 1889 – 30 April 1945) was a German politician and leader of the Nazi Party (Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei; NSDAP). He rose to power as the chancellor of Germany in 1933 and then as Führer in 1934.[a] During his dictatorship from 1933 to 1945, he initiated World War II in Europe by invading Poland on 1 September 1939. He was closely involved in military operations throughout the war and was central to the perpetration of the Holocaust.

  • Shawn&Inna Barrett 7 months ago


    In Section 922(g) of title 18, United States Code the Brady Bill prohibits certain persons from shipping or transporting any firearm in interstate or foreign commerce, or receiving any firearm which has been shipped or transported in interstate or foreign commerce, or possessing any firearm in or affecting commerce. These prohibitions apply to any person who:

    Has been convicted in any court of a crime punishable by imprisonment for a term exceeding one year;

    Is a fugitive from justice;

    Is an unlawful user of or addicted to any controlled substance;

    Has been adjudicated as a mental defective or committed to a mental institution;

    Is an alien illegally or unlawfully in the United States;

    Has been discharged from the Armed Forces under dishonorable conditions;

    Having been a citizen of the United States, has renounced U.S. citizenship;

    Is subject to a court order that restrains the person from harassing, stalking, or threatening an intimate partner or child of such intimate partner, or;

    Has been convicted in any court of a misdemeanor crime of domestic violence.


    any domestic violence crimes cant prevent a person from possession of any firearms

    in the past people who liked to hunt do they give up hobby??

    lot of people are alcohol addicts or marihuana addicts so they cant have arms?

    what is mental defective?

    and that is since being canceled

    what does it mean intimate partner there is married peopel which means domestic 

    and there is civil which means not married

    so they specifically harass peopel on restraining order which is not a conviction

    thsi whole gan control parade and propaganda is a biggest stupidity there is 

    people are very angry and even trying to take gone away from them is not going to help . a very angry person can only get more angry if also his hobbies are affected for example by the order. 

    in addition police that is violent n regular basis they cant carry arms either 

    cause they are very abusive as a rule

    peopel in domestic case can very easily use knife and other means to hurt people family members or whoever they wat not with fans only. this rules are really outside of the point. if threats are involved they involve knife attacks why they make an oder d not carry guns

    the restraining orders they created are mer than monstrosity instead of couple canceling they continue to this of restricting peopel in ways that not really helping 

    and do not name any sense whatsoever

    The National Instant Criminal Background Check System (NICS) is a United States system for determining if prospective firearms or explosives buyers’ name and birth year match those of a person who is not eligible to buy. It was mandated by the Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act (Brady Law) of 1993 and launched by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) in 1998.

    After a prospective buyer completes the appropriate form, the holder of a Federal Firearms License (FFL) initiates the background check by phone or computer. Most checks are determined within minutes. If a determination is not obtained within three business days then the transfer may legally be completed.

    Background checks are not required under federal law for intrastate firearm transfers between private parties. 

    Some states require background checks for firearm transfers. These states either require gun sales to be processed through an FFL holder, or they require that the buyer obtain a license or permit from the state.

    this is circus there is only visibility that law exist

    there is no law 

    cause people  buy guns from each other very easily and that does not even require any background check 

    A buyer who believes that a NICS denial is erroneous may appeal the decision by either challenging the accuracy of the record used in the evaluation of the denial or claiming that the record used as basis for the denial is invalid or does not pertain to the buyer.[14] 

    The provisions for appeals are outlined in the NICS Regulations at Title 28, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 25.10, and Subsection 103 (f) and (g) and Section 104 of the Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act of 1993.

    According to the National Rifle Association, false positives in the NICS system deny citizens’ Second Amendment rights.[15] 

    The NRA says that “there is significant reason to believe that the number of erroneous denials is far greater than those overturned on appeal” because some people may not appeal erroneous denials.[15]

    In an operations report in 2014 by the FBI, of a total of 

    90,895 “deny transactions”, 

    4,411 (about 5%) were overturned after further research by the NICS section. 

    According to the report,

  • Shawn&Inna Barrett 7 months ago


    peopel sitting under the draft 

    the flow f cold air form AC for example spikes the clod and flu per eis correlation between the draft and the cold flu symptoms

    in NY sex clubs?

    as essential business

    Jimmy you can resume going to sex clubs

    Fauci is a monster

    I am not sure how they keep him around 

    did I say it

    because he fails repeatedly to explain to people about consent 

    and do they want to create a new splash of plague in US, even plague is treated with antibiotic

    but it sounds if severe cold and flu remain untreated it can cause plague in people

    they approved the draft written by Hamilton as constitution ?

    he wanted to be crowned do you know he has position of Manuchin? A Hamilton

    better move in Washington marriages fro people after 62 denigrated to domestic partnerships

    blake lovely?

    we used to idealize the type of jobs Manuchin has

  • Shawn&Inna Barrett 7 months ago


    some old people in Russia not able to use apps

    or not having smart phones until now that is why they use paper in US 

    everyone knows really how to use app and smart phones

    who any more has fold phone only very eccentric people


    Can Russian help the botanics isn Sri Lanka?

    While Hamilton was stationed in Morristown, New Jersey, in the winter of December 1779 – March 1780, he met Elizabeth Schuyler, a daughter of General Philip Schuyler and Catherine Van Rensselaer. The two were married on December 14, 1780, at the Schuyler Mansion in Albany, New York.[211]

    Elizabeth and Alexander Hamilton had eight children, though there is often confusion because two sons were named Philip:

    Philip (1782–1801), died in a duel, just as his father would three years later.[212]

    Angelica (1784–1857)

    Alexander Jr. (1786–1875)

    James Alexander (1788–1878)[213]

    John Church (1792–1882)

    William Stephen (1797–1850)

    Eliza (1799–1859)

    Philip, also called Little Phil (1802–1884), named after his older brother who had been killed in a duel the previous year

    Hamilton died at two o’clock the following afternoon, July 12, 1804,[206][207] at Bayard’s home just below the present Gansevoort Street.[208] Gouverneur Morris gave the eulogy at his funeral and secretly established a fund to support his widow and children

    In the summer of 1797, Hamilton became the first major American politician publicly involved in a sex scandal.[167] Six years earlier, in the summer of 1791, 34-year-old Hamilton started an affair with 23-year-old Maria Reynolds. According to Hamilton’s recount, Maria approached him at his house in Philadelphia, claiming that her husband, James Reynolds, had abandoned her and she wished to return to her relatives in New York but lacked the means.[85]:366–69 Hamilton retrieved her address and delivered her $30 personally at her boarding house where she led him into her bedroom and “Some conversation ensued from which it was quickly apparent that other than pecuniary consolation would be acceptable”. The two began an intermittent illicit affair that lasted approximately until June 1792

    Over the course of that year, while the affair took place, James Reynolds was well aware of his wife’s unfaithfulness. He continually supported their relationship to regularly gain blackmail money from Hamilton. The common practice in the day was for the wronged husband to seek retribution in a pistol duel, but Reynolds, realizing how much Hamilton had to lose if his activity came into public view, insisted on monetary compensation instead.[169] After an initial request of $1,000[170] to which Hamilton complied, Reynolds invited Hamilton to renew his visits to his wife “as a friend”[171] only to extort forced “loans” after each visit that the most likely colluding Maria solicited with her letters. In the end the blackmail payments totaled over $1,300 including the initial extortion.[85]:369 Hamilton at this point was possibly aware of both Reynoldses being involved in the blackmail[172] and welcomed as well as strictly complied with Reynolds’ request to end the affair.[168][173]

    In November 1792, James Reynolds and his associate Jacob Clingman were arrested for counterfeiting and speculating in veteran back wages. Clingman was released on bail and relayed information to James Monroe that Reynolds had evidence that would incriminate Hamilton. Monroe consulted with Congressmen Muhlenberg and Venable on what actions to take and the Congressmen confronted Hamilton on December 15, 1792.[168] Hamilton refuted the suspicions of speculation by exposing his affair with Maria and producing as evidence the letters by both Reynoldses, proving that his payments to James Reynolds related to blackmail over his adultery, and not to treasury misconduct. The trio were to keep the documents privately with the utmost confidence.[85]:366–69

    In the summer of 1797, however, when “notoriously scurrilous journalist” James T. Callender published A History of the United States for the Year 1796, it contained accusations of James Reynolds being an agent of Hamilton, using documents from the confrontation of December 15, 1792. On July 5, 1797, Hamilton wrote to Monroe, Muhlenberg and Venable asking them to confirm that there was nothing that would damage the perception of his integrity while Secretary of Treasury. All complied with Hamilton’s request but Monroe. Hamilton then published a 100-page booklet, later usually referred to as the Reynolds Pamphlet, and discussed the affair in exquisite detail. Hamilton’s wife Elizabeth eventually forgave him, but not Monroe.[original research?] Although he faced ridicule from the Democratic-Republican faction, he maintained his availability for public service

    Hamilton served as inspector general of the United States Army from July 18, 1798, to June 15, 1800. Because Washington was unwilling to leave Mount Vernon unless it were to command an army in the field, Hamilton was the de facto head of the army, to Adams’s considerable displeasure. If full-scale war broke out with France, Hamilton argued that the army should conquer the North American colonies of France’s ally, Spain, bordering the United States.[176] Hamilton was prepared to march his army through the Southern United States if necessary, possibly also using his army in Virginia to quash opposition to Adams and himself.[177]

    To fund this army, Hamilton wrote regularly to Oliver Wolcott Jr., his successor at the Treasury; William Loughton Smith, of the House Ways and Means Committee; and Senator Theodore Sedgwick of Massachusetts. He directed them to pass a direct tax to fund the war. Smith resigned in July 1797, as Hamilton scolded him for slowness, and told Wolcott to tax houses instead of land.[178] The eventual program included a Stamp Act like that of the British before the Revolution and other taxes on land, houses, and slaves, calculated at different rates in different states, and requiring difficult and intricate assessment of houses.[179] This provoked resistance in southeastern Pennsylvania, led primarily by men such as John Fries who had marched with Washington against the Whiskey Rebellion.[180]

    Hamilton aided in all areas of the army’s development, and after Washington’s death he was by default the Senior Officer of the United States Army from December 14, 1799, to June 15, 1800. The army was to guard against invasion from France. Adams, however, derailed all plans for war by opening negotiations with France that led to peace.[181] There was no longer a need for the army Hamilton was running.[182] Adams discovered that key members of his cabinet, namely Secretary of State Timothy Pickering and Secretary of War James McHenry, were more loyal to Hamilton rather than himself; Adams fired them in May 1800.[183]

    Soon after the 1804 gubernatorial election in New York—in which Morgan Lewis, greatly assisted by Hamilton, defeated Aaron Burr—the Albany Register published Charles D. Cooper’s letters, 

    citing Hamilton’s 

    opposition to Burr and alleging that Hamilton had expressed 

    “a still more despicable opinion” 

    of the Vice President at an upstate New York dinner party.[191][192] 

    Cooper claimed that the letter was intercepted after 

    relaying the information, but stated he was “unusually cautious” 

    in recollecting the information from the dinner.[193]

    Burr, sensing an attack on his honor, and recovering from his defeat, 

    demanded an apology in letter form. 

    Hamilton wrote a letter in response and ultimately

  • Shawn&Inna Barrett 7 months ago


    so how a judge voting for major decision 

    and then does president need to know how the judges are appointed by president making independent decisions with talking to president ??

    president trump shows hostility towards Russian and towards China, that wasnt intent 

    that was actually good idea by President trump everything that president Macron is complaining about 

    environmental and security

    Russian need to save they 300 and 400 to defend self?

    are they trying to make deals to buy all Russian weapons

    f u c k n  o u  s

    who is 5?

    that was that  horrible greedy lady there with porch as well who said she only want to get more rich

    she is no longer with I M f 

    she is with world b a n  K

    she say IMF wants weaker US

    DUB I N A


  • Shawn&Inna Barrett 7 months ago


    Must offer counseling for marriage not optional at each break down of domestic partnership especially if someone is cheating  and never offer or order stopping communication during mediation 

    there can’t be divorce order only registration same as marriage wines by two people unless one is proven deceased

  • Shawn&Inna Barrett 7 months ago



    black house

    700K population in Washington DC

    more division?

    Wyoming  Vermont are smaller but they have to manage a large pieces of land 

    and Washington DC is a small city 

    bureaucracy driven no need to manage anything they all fed there very well 

    why would US give land to a separate black state 

    and it has White house on that territory

    Vermont is a great place for outdoor enthusiasts.

    Many Vermonters live active lifestyles, whether because they choose to be active in their leisure time or because they work in the state’s agricultural sector. The state has plenty of outdoor places such as national and state forests, parks and campgrounds.

    Population: 623,989 (2019)

    Is Wyoming a good place to live?

    Affordability. Wyoming is home to many small cities, but the cost of living in them is often well below the national average. … Meanwhile, Wyoming has some of the lowest taxes in the country – it recently came in as the fourth best state to live in for tax day.

    Population: 578,759 (2019) Trending

    is not changing anything but adding a drop to avalanche

    so Washington DC isn’t a poor state and do they want to create self taxes and the benefits under umbrella of black life

    Is Washington DC is a city or a state?

    Washington, D.C., formally the District of Columbia and also known as D.C. or Washington, is the capital city of the United States of America.

    and they want to make it black state the capital city??

    u serious??

    not a little bit

    41 or 42

    I do not think that president putin comfortable to say ty even in private with president Macron

    is this what happens with president Macron with all other country leaders 

    in private?

  • Shawn&Inna Barrett 7 months ago


    strategic land

    any one who support also blowing up mount rash more

    what happens is that they can start wearing the indian outfits and start joingin doing tribal dancing around the mountain 

    i hope you realize that bringing civilization is not appreciated at all by tribal communities u to this day they have not really seen benefits but they also do not want to change and they allowed to exist on their trial lands similar to gorillas in protected national parks

    they asked to be left alone their

    but it is not helping them they will not stop being unhahhy until they want all american civilization off their territory so they can dance their tribal dance anywhere they want

    in britain 

    they want to remove som emoluments but the question is people who want to remove them where they remove them to?? pricvate collections??

    so they want to removed them because they want them for private collections

    also there is a professor in cambridge tat wrote an article white lives do not matter and received promotion because she wrote this article

    they say that peel who protest 

    a not poor type of students liberally minded that supposedly out of their mind pretty much


    they want to hire more black skin professors

  • Shawn&Inna Barrett 7 months ago


    too many white peopel did not realize why they are white and why it is essential yet


    miss z  b a ss

  • Jon C 7 months ago

    It’s crazy, anytime I see Kermit or any of the other Muppets, I see them as being real.

  • Shamali Wijegunawardhana 7 months ago

    Woah…am I the only one who thinks that young Conan is kinda hot? (Even with that rather strange suit)

  • Lil_LyriX 7 months ago

    *You know that this video is old when the painting behind them has the Twin Towers in it*


Add your comment

Your email address will not be published.