A Woman On The Moon By 2024!

5597
Published on May 18, 2019

This week in Mooooon Newwwws… #LSSC #Colbert #Monologue

Category Tag

20 comments

  • MonkofRa 1 month ago

    Nice right as Elon is landing supplies on Mars.

    Reply
  • Mistress Jen 1 month ago

    Artemis? Dammit, wrong Sailor Moon cat. They had Luna right there they could have used instead. 😉😂😂😂

    Reply
  • david white 1 month ago

    they should send a woman with a round face/head that looks like the Moon

    Reply
  • mocki rangne 1 month ago

    So Drumpf defunded NASA by millions 2 years ago and now he’s giving the money back, King of Chaos in action.

    Reply
  • mocki rangne 1 month ago

    La Luna, moon already represents women!

    Reply
  • Dominik S 1 month ago

    Can we send a woman to the White House in 2020?

    Reply
  • jzizzles 1 month ago

    Trump says “we’re going back to the moon”.

    NASA says: Crap, now we have to hire more people do the CGI. This make make it look real!

    Reply
  • aon10003 1 month ago

    I vote for Hi…..

    Reply
  • Simran Simran 1 month ago

    Anyway, Artemis is a much more approach name for a moon mission.

    Reply
  • Bryce Cheng 1 month ago

    I can’t even get a White blonde woman on my bed. Maybe in 2050 I’ll be lucky.

    Reply
  • Lee McMindes 1 month ago

    Is her name Alice?

    Reply
  • wel1968 1 month ago

    Have been talking about it since the 60’s with that old tv show ‘The Honeymooners.’ About time…

    Reply
  • Laban Warner 1 month ago

    do we have to again? really all the money going to that could help us

    Reply
  • W Smith meos 1 month ago

    moon makes baby ?

    Reply
  • Pixie Fairy 1 month ago

    NASA’s been really rude to the Moon lately. First it was getting old, now it’s cold and shriveled. I’m seeing the romance fade.

    Reply
  • Paul J. Morton 1 month ago

    Interesting. Trump increases NASA budget significantly, not a single clap. NASA anounces woman on moon, loud cheering.

    Did Trump not do an applaudable thing?

    Reply
  • Claudio Jaramillo 1 month ago

    Trump wants to spend 1.6 billion to put a woman on the moon for no apparent reason other than PR (going to the moon is useless), but yet pulls back 1 billion from California’s high speed rail

    Reply
  • Uridium 1 month ago

    If a woman is the best suited out of all the astronauts then sure. But as a goal.. Why? Too much at stake for a moon mission to be about gender.

    Reply
  • TWSTF 8 1 month ago

    Should have called it; “Moonwhile.”

    Reply
  • James F 1 month ago

    Tell the people where he’s getting that additional 1.6 billion dollars Stephen.

    Reply

Add your comment

Your email address will not be published.